:focal(10x335:11x336)/https://public-media.si-cdn.com/filer/14/ba/14bae732-ed10-4e19-b664-6df9a2d4ae6a/delta_wave.jpg)
Brain waves are normally the stuff of beeping hospital machines, but this Friday, they’ll be on display at the Smithsonian’s Arts and Industries Building. Artist Julia Buntaine Hoel, whose work exists at the intersection of science and art, has handcrafted thickets of black wire—sculptures aptly named Alpha, Beta, Delta, Gamma and Theta Wave(s)—that imagine the varying electrical activity of the brain in 3-D form.
Hoel was an artist long before science piqued her interest. She attended an arts high school in Natick, Massachusetts, but while at Hampshire College, she enrolled in a Neuroscience 101 course and was hooked. After that, Hoel spent time “running from the lab to the studio,” studying both neuroscience and sculpture. All of that knowledge about brain regions and neurotransmitters has spilled over into the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based artist’s work ever since. She’s arranged images of brain cortex slices like a swarm of cobalt butterflies, painted a topographical model of the New York City skyline with an overlay of a brain activity scan, and made a gif that displays a month of frontal lobe activation.





Hoel’s interdisciplinary work fits into a niche called SciArt—a convergence of the artistic and scientific community has boomed in the past five to ten years, she says. And Hoel would know; she’s the founder of SciArt Magazine and the director of SciArt Center, an organization that co-hosts discipline-spanning pop-up events, offers grants and pairs artists with scientific collaborators in a virtual residency program. The umbrella of SciArt allows the two worlds to come together in a mutually beneficial way, says Hoel: “For artists, science is a wealth of information and a wealth of inspiration. And artists, in turn, can share science with the public.” SciArt also hinges on recognizing the similarities between the two professions. Contrary to stereotypes that paint artists as unpredictable creatives and scientists as relentlessly logical and rigid, she says, “creativity is necessary” for both callings.
Yes, painters and microbiologists might use different tools and operate from distinct points of view, but, as Hoel puts it, “Artists and scientists essentially ask the same questions about what it means to be a human being.”
0 Σχόλια